JS wrote:But won't the water deteriorate the membrane after a while?

Nathan wrote:How does it keep from leaking? Just the paper?

Roy Lewis wrote:They should be staggered.

greenvalley wrote:Your staying over this time Scot? That drive was long huh. What time are you coming in

Mike Casey wrote:

scotbaker wrote:

Mike Casey wrote:

scotbaker wrote:

Mike Casey wrote:Hey I know you! As far as EIFS I would identify it as such, and if more than about a 12-15 year old installation (old technology barrier system) I would strongly recommend a separate EIFS inspection as there could be leakage and hidden damage, and you can't tell visually. The newer systems are required to be drainage type, however, I would be really careful about inspecting around openings for evidence of water, and advise it would be prudent to have a separate EIFS specialist inspection just to be sure there are no issues.

Looking forward to hearing you speak in So Cal in July.

Thanks! Yes, the 21st. Funny you mentioned it as I just confirmed with Eric this morning before you got up.

Before I got up? I am an old construction guy. You know work starts at 7 am.

Just busting 'em. I knew you'd see that!

Mike Casey wrote:

scotbaker wrote:

Mike Casey wrote:Hey I know you! As far as EIFS I would identify it as such, and if more than about a 12-15 year old installation (old technology barrier system) I would strongly recommend a separate EIFS inspection as there could be leakage and hidden damage, and you can't tell visually. The newer systems are required to be drainage type, however, I would be really careful about inspecting around openings for evidence of water, and advise it would be prudent to have a separate EIFS specialist inspection just to be sure there are no issues.

Looking forward to hearing you speak in So Cal in July.

Thanks! Yes, the 21st. Funny you mentioned it as I just confirmed with Eric this morning before you got up.

Mike Casey wrote:Hey I know you! As far as EIFS I would identify it as such, and if more than about a 12-15 year old installation (old technology barrier system) I would strongly recommend a separate EIFS inspection as there could be leakage and hidden damage, and you can't tell visually. The newer systems are required to be drainage type, however, I would be really careful about inspecting around openings for evidence of water, and advise it would be prudent to have a separate EIFS specialist inspection just to be sure there are no issues.

Jeremiah Anderson wrote:

scotbaker wrote:

umesh2628 wrote:Commercial Projects Noida

The Iconic Corenthum
Bhutani Alphathum
Panchsheel Greens II Commercial Hub
IDI Mart

More Alien crap.

That's funny Godzilla!

Mike Casey wrote:This is really a question for an attorney in your state. I know here in CA agents sign occasionally, and they write under the signature "as agent for MM buyer (insert name here)" and it works. RE agents have a fiduciary duty to their clients as they negotiate prices, deals, etc. HI's don't, so we could not do that. We have a contractual duty to our clients to perform as specified in our contract and per local standard of care.

umesh2628 wrote:Commercial Projects Noida

The Iconic Corenthum
Bhutani Alphathum
Panchsheel Greens II Commercial Hub
IDI Mart

rthowell wrote:We all like software for different reasons, and I came into the industry without a preference. That said, I've found a newer company, HomeHubZone, to be the most forward looking, both in terms of design (which is more than just looking pretty), and the way they pull MLS data to build an accurate template of each house I inspect. It saves me a lot of taps on my tablet. That said, I prefer sending the report through ISN, and they don't automatically pass that off just yet. They do, however, have their own report delivery method that automatically sends to the client. Finally, they are also integrated with ISN in terms of pulling order data. So, I just open the app and tap on the address to get started.

Just my two cents as a n00b.